Title of the article |
Informational and Communicative Competence Formation in the Text Activity Process |
||||
Authors | Melikhova A. A. | ||||
In the section | THE HUMANITIES IN EDUCATION | ||||
Year | 2013 | Issue | №8 | Pages | |
Type of article | Index UDK | Index BBK | |||
Abstract | The paper is devoted to the problem of fostering the informational and communicative competence, regarded as the capability of meaningful work with information, its personalized understanding and implementation in professional activity. As a solution to the problem, the author indicates the developing potential of text activity, performed in a dialog enriched by ideas of hermeneutics and meaning-making. The competence in question should be developed stage-by-stage by role-playing the professionally focused situations; applying the symbolic contextual approach by A. A. Verbitsky; using different tasks to enable understanding, comprehension of new semantics, correlation with students' personal experience; and promoting self-understanding, self-awareness and value attitude. The above activities should result in training competent experts with a broad cultural outlook and capability to adapt to and work in the modern information society, find creative solutions to the complex challenges, and communicate in the global cross-cultural environment. | ||||
Download | аннотация.pdf | ||||
Index terms | informational and communicative competence, text, text activity, dialog, meaning, meaning-making. | ||||
References |
1. Bakhtin M. M. Aesthetics of verbal creativity. M.: Art, 1979. 424 p. (In Russian). 2. Belyakova E. G. // Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2009. № 5. Р. 8–15. (In Russian). 3. Bibler V. S. From naukoucheniya – the logic of culture. Two philosophical introduction to the twenty-first century. M.: Politizdat. 1991. 411 p. (In Russian). 4. Verbitsky A. A. // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo gumanitarnogo universiteta im. M. A. Sholohova. Pedagogika i psihologija. 2012. № 2. Р. 52–60. (In Russian). 5. Dridze T. M. Text activity in the structure of social communication. M.: Nauka. 1984. 268 p. (In Russian). 6. Zagvyazinsky V. I. // Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 9. Р. 6–11. (In Russian). 7. Zakirova A. F. // Vestnik Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. 2012. № 9. Р. 12–19. (In Russian). 8. Federal State Educational Standard. Available in: http://www. fgosvpo. ru. 9. Heuristic Learning: Methodology. M.: EIDOS. 2012. 208 p. (In Russian). 10. Drucker P. F. Managing in the next Society. New York: St. Martin's Press, 2002. 248 p. (Translated from English). 11. Caccamise D., Snyder L. & Kintsch E. Constructivist theory and the situation model: Relevance to future assessment of reading comprehension. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford, 2008. Р. 80–97. (Translated from English). 12. Duke N. K. & Carlisle J. The development of comprehension. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.). Handbook of reading research. New York: Routledge, 2011. Vol. IV. Р. 199–228. (Translated from English). 13. Foorman B. R. & Connor C. M. Primary grade reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.). Handbook of reading research: Vol. IV. New York: Routledge, 2011. Р. 136–156. (Translated from English). 14. Snow C. E. & Sweet A. P. Reading for comprehension. In C. E. Snow & A. P. Sweet (Eds.). Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford, 2003. Р. 1–11. (Translated from English). |