The aim of the article is to consider the issues of professional competence formation of the teacher of preschool education in the system of additional education; the necessity of educational space extension of preschool children is proved.

Methods. The author relies on the technique of the competency approach to teacher preparation pre-school education, while using both theoretical and empirical research methods. The methods involve the retrospective analysis of research works of Russian scholars on pedagogics and psychology; empirical methods – pedagogical diagnostics on the basis of questioning, analysis of psycho-pedagogical diagnosis.

Results. In the course of pedagogical diagnostics in order to determine whether the content of teacher competence features educational activities in terms of pre-school education it was found that among the most important qualities required of a teacher of preschool education, the respondents allocate humanely-personal and communication skills, functional literacy and reflective skills; majority of respondents found it difficult and/or do not know how to put into practice the polysubjective principle, which is very important at the level of pre-school education. The process of skills formation is described to carry out student teaching on the basis of the proposed principle. It is suggested to put students – the future teachers into the teaching process or real professional work in phases.

Scientific novelty and practical significance. The author gives the classification of groups of professional competence indicators of the teacher of preschool education. Ways for the decision of the priority problems defined in Federal State Educational Standard of Pre-school Education (FSES PE) in a context of the polysubjective approach are shown; each participant of educational process acts as its active member.

The author of article considers additional education as a perspective direction of development of preschool pedagogics, which despite the gathered wide experience of children development by means of additional educational services, has not been considered yet as the complex phenomenon and a resource of optimisation of preschool preparation of children. Attention is drawn to the fact that yet now, the deep comparative analysis of the performance efficiency with preschool children of the general and additional educational institutions hasn’t been carried. It is also required to design the system of expert assessment and working out of diagnostic procedures for defining the productivity of experts training programs of an additional education; and conformance inspection of these programs due to specifications of Federal State Educational Standard of Pre-school Education (FSES PE). Such research works will help to provide the maximum achievement of a purpose of preschool pedagogics – complex development of intellectual, spiritually-moral, creative and physical potential of children.

1. Ab­dul­li­na O. A. Obshhe­pe­da­go­gic­hes­ka­ja pod­go­tov­ka uc­hi­tel­ja v sis­te­me vysshe­go pe­da­go­gic­hes­ko­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja. [Ge­ne­ral pe­da­go­gi­cal pre­pa­ra­ti­on of te­ac­hers in the system of hig­her pe­da­go­gi­cal edu­ca­ti­on]. Mos­cow: Pub­lis­hing Hou­se Edu­ca­ti­on, 1990. 141 p. (In Rus­si­an)

2. An­to­lo­gi­ja pe­da­go­gic­hes­koj mysli Ros­sii XVIII ve­ka. [Antho­logy of pe­da­go­gi­cal tho­ught in Rus­sia in XVIII cen­tury]. Ed. by I. A. So­lov­kov. Mos­cow: Pub­lis­hing Hou­se Pe­da­gogy, 1985. 480 p. (In Rus­si­an)

3. An­to­lo­gi­ja pe­da­go­gic­hes­koj mysli Ros­sii vto­roj po­lo­viny XIX – nac­ha­la XX ve­ka. [Antho­logy of pe­da­go­gi­cal tho­ught of Rus­sia in the se­cond half of XIX – be­gin­ning of XX cen­tury]. Ed. by P. A. Le­be­dev. Mos­cow: Pub­lis­hing Hou­se Pe­da­gogy, 1990. 608 p. (In Rus­si­an)

4. As­mo­lov A. G. Stra­te­gi­ja so­ci­okul’tur­noj mo­der­ni­za­cii ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja: na pu­ti k pre­odo­le­ni­ja kri­zi­sa iden­tichnos­ti i postro­eni­ju grazhdansko­go obshhestva. [Stra­tegy of so­cio-cul­tu­ral mo­der­ni­za­ti­on of edu­ca­ti­on: on the way to over­co­me an iden­tity cri­sis and bu­il­ding a ci­vil so­ci­ety]. Vop­rosy psi­ho­lo­gii. [Psycho­logy Is­su­es]. 2008. № 1. Р. 65–86. (In Rus­si­an)

5. Vak­hi­to­va G. H. Oso­ben­nos­ti pod­go­tov­ki pe­da­go­ga predshkol’no­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja na os­no­ve kom­pe­tentnostno­go pod­ho­da. [Pe­cu­li­ari­ti­es of pre­pa­ra­ti­on of te­ac­her of prescho­ol edu­ca­ti­on on the ba­sis of com­pe­ten­ce appro­ach]. Ma­te­ri­aly Res­pub­li­kanskoj na­uchno-prakt. konf. [Ma­te­ri­als of the Re­pub­li­can Sci­en­ti­fic-Prac­ti­cal con­fe­ren­ce]. 2013. Ust-Ka­me­no­gorsk. P. 173–177. (In Rus­si­an)

6. Vak­hi­to­va G. H. Psi­ho­lo­go-pe­da­go­gic­hes­kie as­pekty kom­pe­tentnostno­go pod­ho­da v sis­te­me vysshe­go pro­fes­si­onal’no­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja. [Psycho­lo­gi­cal and pe­da­go­gi­cal as­pects of com­pe­ten­ce appro­ach in the system of hig­her pro­fes­si­onal edu­ca­ti­on]. Vestnik Tomsko­go pe­da­go­gic­hes­ko­go uni­ver­si­te­ta. [Bul­le­tin of Tomsk Sta­te Pe­da­go­gi­cal Uni­ver­sity]. 2011. № 10 (112). P. 9–13. (In Rus­si­an)

7. Vatchkov I. V. Po­li­sub’ektnyj pod­hod k pe­da­go­gic­hes­ko­mu vza­imo­dejstvi­ju. [Mul­ti­su­bi­ect appro­ach to pe­da­go­gic in­te­rac­ti­on]. Vop­rosy psi­ho­lo­gii. [Psycho­logy Is­su­es]. 2007. № 3. P. 16–29. (In Rus­si­an)

8. Ze­er E. F. Psi­ho­lo­gi­ja pro­fes­si­onal’no­go raz­vi­ti­ja. [Psycho­logy of pro­fes­si­onal de­ve­lop­ment]. Mos­cow: Pub­lis­hing Hou­se Aca­demy, 2007. 428 p. (In Rus­si­an)

9. Sim­na­ya I. A. Kljuc­hev­ye kom­pe­tentnos­ti kak re­zul’ta­tiv­no-ce­le­va­ja os­no­va kom­pe­tentnostno­go pod­ho­da v ob­ra­zo­va­nii. [Key com­pe­ten­ces as ef­fec­ti­vely tar­get the ba­sis of com­pe­ten­ce appro­ach in edu­ca­ti­on]. Mos­cow: Issle­do­va­tel’skij centr prob­lem kac­hestva pod­go­tov­ki spe­ci­alis­tov. [Re­se­arch Centre of Staff Tra­ining Qua­lity Is­su­es]. 2004. 32 p. (In Rus­si­an)

10. Mi­ti­na A. M. Psik­ho­lo­gi­ya pro­fes­si­onal’no­go raz­vi­ti­ya uc­hi­tel­ya. [Psycho­logy of pro­fes­si­onal de­ve­lop­ment of te­ac­hers]. Dokt. diss. Mos­cow. 1995. 49 p. (In Rus­si­an)

11. Poz­de­eva S. I. Oso­ben­nos­ti gu­ma­ni­tar­no­go up­rav­le­ni­ja in­no­va­ci­ja­mi dlja sta­nov­le­ni­ja pro­fes­si­ona­liz­ma pe­da­go­ga nac­hal’noj shkoly. [The Hu­ma­ni­ta­ri­an Fe­atu­res of In­no­va­ti­on for the Te­ac­her Com­pe­ten­ce For­ma­ti­on at Pri­mary Scho­ol]. Vestnik Tomsko­go pe­da­go­gic­hes­ko­go uni­ver­si­te­ta. [Bul­le­tin of Tomsk Sta­te Pe­da­go­gi­cal Uni­ver­sity]. 2013. № 9 (137). P. 194–197. (In Rus­si­an)

12. Tik­ho­mi­ro­va O. V. Pro­fes­si­onal’na­ja kom­pe­tentnost’ pe­da­go­ga kak us­lo­vie re­ali­za­cii os­nov­noj ob­ra­zo­va­tel’noj prog­rammy doshkol’no­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja. [Pro­fes­si­onal com­pe­ten­ce of the te­ac­her as a con­di­ti­on of imple­men­ta­ti­on of the ba­sic edu­ca­ti­onal prog­rams of prescho­ol edu­ca­ti­on]. Detskij sad: te­ori­ja i prak­ti­ka. [Kin­der­gar­ten: the­ory and prac­ti­ce]. 2012. № 4. P. 78–84. (In Rus­si­an)

13. Hu­torskoi A. V. In­no­va­ci­onnyj as­pekt kom­pe­tentnostno­go pod­ho­da v ob­ra­zo­va­nii. [In­no­va­ti­ve as­pect of the com­pe­ten­ce appro­ach in edu­ca­ti­on]. Na­uchnoe nas­le­die T. I. Sha­mo­voj i ego vli­ja­nie na res­he­nie ak­tu­al’nyh prob­lem sov­re­men­no­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja: sbor­nik sta­tej. [Sci­en­ti­fic he­ri­ta­ge of T. I. Sa­mo­vol and its influ­en­ce on the de­ci­si­on of ac­tu­al prob­lems of mo­dern edu­ca­ti­on]. Col­lec­ti­on of ar­tic­les]. V. 1. Mos­cow, 2011. P. 79–83. (In Rus­si­an)

14. Shad­ri­kov V. D., Kar­pov A. V., Kuz­net­so­va I. V. Pro­fes­si­ona­lizm sov­re­men­no­go pe­da­go­ga: me­to­di­ka ocen­ki urovnja kva­li­fi­ka­cii pe­da­go­gic­hes­kih ra­bot­ni­kov. [Pro­fes­si­ona­lism of a mo­dern te­ac­her: met­hods of as­ses­sing the le­vel of pro­fes­si­onal skill of pe­da­go­gi­cal emplo­ye­es]. Mos­cow, 2011. 168 p. (In Rus­si­an)