The paper considers the problem of educational quality assessment considerably complicated by socio-cultural multidimensionality of educational process obstructing the development of comprehensive quantitative criteria. Formal monitoring can not always evaluate teaching plan, identify the culturalogy bases of education and upbringing, denote the atmosphere and way of life in educational institution, realize the personal growth directions and self-development potentials guaranteeing the growth. Quality management of education should involve continuous feedback from the participants of educational process to facilitate the effectiveness of the results. It is indicated, that too much control over the functions of educational institution most often does not result in quality improvement distorting the values and goals of education and upbringing.

The research findings can be applied in the field of educational theory, its culturalogical directions, and development management of educational systems and processes.

1. Valeev G. H. Examination of research in the field of socio-humanitarian knowledge // Pedagogika. 2006. № 5. S. 27.

2. Denisenko A. Education: from the social sphere - the investment // Delovoe Prikam'e. 2007. № 15.

3. Zagvjazinskij V. I. Social functions of education and its strategic orientation in the period of modernization // Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. 2011 № 7 (86). S. 17.

4. Lapin N. I. Modernization of the basic values ​​of Russians // Sociolog. issledovanija. 1996. № 5.

5. Latypova R. How much creative work now? // Uchit. gaz. 2008. № 2.

6. Lobok A. M. The professional expertise of teaching: how to overcome the mirage? // Vospitanie. Obrazovanie. Pedagogika. M.: Chistye prudy, 2008. S. 13.

7. Platoov A. Intuition of the truth. M., 1990. S. 40.

8. Sergeev O. Unified State Exam: a script failure// Ros. obrazovanie dlja vseh. 2007. № 08 (09). S. 4.

9. Fromm Je. Psihoanaliz i jetika. M.: AST-LTD, 1998. S. 104.