The research objective is to demonstrate the specificity of artisan training in the Ural region in the XVII–XVIII cen­tu­ri­es, and explore the relating historical and pedagogical heritage and its implementation in the modern vocational training system.

Methods: The applied theoretical methods include the historical and genetic comparative analysis and synthesis of identified trends and specificities of artisan training; empirical methods involve data selection, analysis, systematization and classification. 

Results: The research findings reveal the specifics and key components of the artisan training system designed for developing the trainees’ abilities and practical skills.

Scientific novelty: The proposed structure of historical pedagogical heritage is specified including the objective, axiological, regulative and technological aspects.

Practical significance: The achieved results concerning the craftsmanship development in the past can be incorporated into the modern vocational training programs.

1. Sta­te Archive of Sverdlovskaya Oblast. Resource 643; Inventory no. 1, File 302, List 1 (In Russian)

2. Goncha­rov S. Z. Kreativnost’ remeslennoj dejatel’nosti [Creativity of Craftsmanship]. III Khudoyarovskie Readings. N. Ta­gil.: Media-Print. 2008. V. 3. Р. 14–16. (In Russian)

3. Cha­pa­ev N. K. i dr. Gornozavodskie shkoly kak fenomen russkoj pedagogicheskoj kul’tury. [Mining Schools as Russian Pedagogical Culture Phenomenon]. Yekaterinburg: RSVPU. 2008. 196 p. (In Russian)

4. Gri­ben­juk G. G. Pe­da­go­gic­hes­kie uslovija formirovanija social’noj kompetentnosti obuchajushhihsja gornozavodskih shkol Urala. [Pedagogical Conditions for the Social Competence development of Ural Mining Schools Students]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical Education in Russia]. 2008. Vol. 2. № 1. Р. 60–62. (In Russian)

5. Dnep­rov S. A., Maksjashin A. S. Ge­ne­zis hudozhestvennogo obrazovanija v oblasti izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva Urala (metodologija, istorija i perspektivy) [The Genesis of artistic Education in Ural Fine Arts Field (methodology, history and prospects)]. Obrazovanie i nauka. Izv. UrO RAO. [Education and Science. News of Ural Branch of Russian Academy of Education]. 2007. Vol. 48. № 6. Р. 89–100. (In Russian)

6. Dnep­rov S. A., Maksjashin A. S. Hu­doz­hestven­noe obrazovanie v oblasti izobrazitel’nogo iskusstva Urala kak zerkalo modernizacij XVIII–XX ve­kov. [Artistic Education in the Ural Fine Arts Field as the mirror of Modernization in XVIII–XX cen­tu­ri­es]. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical Education in Russia]. 2010. Vol. 9. № 2. Р. 6–15. (In Russian)

7. Za­vodskoj ustav V. N. Ta­tishhe­va (1734–1736 gg.). [Works Regulations by Tatischev (1734–1736)]. Gornyj zhurnal. [Mining Magazine]. St. Petersburg, 1831. Part 3. Vol. 9. Р. 316–319. (In Russian)

8. Instruk­ci­ja V. N. Ta­tishhe­va o porjadke prepodavanija v shkolah pri ural’skih kazennyh zavodah Tatischev’s [Instruction about School Tutoring at Ural State Works]. Ist. arhiv [Historical Archive]. 1950. Vol. 5. Р. 166–178. (In Russian)

9. Ro­man­cev G. M., Efanov A. V. Re­mes­len­ni­ki XXI ve­ka: vperedi jepoha Renessansa. [Craftsmen of the XXI century: Renaissance Epoch ahead]. Akkreditacija v obrazovanii [Accreditation in Education]. 2012. Vol. 60. № 12. Р. 62–64. (In Russian)

10. Si­lo­no­va O. N. Kre­postnye hudozhniki Demidovyh. Uchilishhe zhivopisi. Hudojarovy. XVIII–XIX ve­ka. Iz istorii podgotovki specialistov hudozhestvennyh i hudozhestvenno-re­mes­lennyh professij Demidovymi. [Serf Artists of Demidovs. Fine Art College. Khudoyarovs. XVIII–XIX cen­tury. From the history of artistic and artistic crafts training by Demidovs]. Yekaterinburg: Basco. 2007. 416 p. (In Russian)

11. Cha­pa­ev N. K. Re­in­teg­ra­tiv­na­ja missija remeslennogo obrazovanija. [Reintegrating Mission of Trade Education]. Ekaterinburg: RSVPU. 2011. Р. 285–291. (In Russian)