Fomina O.I.

Title of the article The Peculiarities of the U.S. Higher Education Development Strategy in the Context of Current Conditions
Authors Fomina Olga I.
In the section EDUCATION ABROAD
Year 2014 Issue №10 Pages 118
Type of article   Index UDK   Index BBK  
Abstract

The aim of the re­se­arch is to in­ves­ti­ga­te a cur­rent sta­te of the US hig­her edu­ca­ti­on and to show obstac­les in a way of its in­no­va­ti­ve per­fec­ti­on; to re­ve­al spe­ci­fi­city of the US sta­te po­licy con­cer­ning the hig­her scho­ol; to de­fi­ne fac­tors that influ­en­ce the ef­fec­ti­ve­ness of the Ame­ri­can re­se­arch uni­ver­si­ti­es du­ring the last de­ca­des.

Met­hods. The aut­hor appli­es for met­hods of the ret­ros­pec­ti­ve and lo­gic analysis whi­le con­si­de­ring so­ci­al and eco­no­mic con­di­ti­ons and fe­atu­res of functi­oning of the Ame­ri­can hig­her edu­ca­ti­onal insti­tu­ti­ons du­ring the lat­ter half of 20th – the early 21st cen­tu­ri­es. Conclu­si­ons on a con­di­ti­on and pros­pects of de­ve­lop­ment of the US hig­her edu­ca­ti­on are ma­de on the ba­sis of the re­vi­ew and the aut­hor’s in­terpre­ta­ti­on of ori­gi­nal do­cu­men­tary so­ur­ces te­nor and the of­fi­ci­al sta­tis­ti­cal da­ta.

Re­sults. The aut­hor spe­ci­fi­es the gro­ups of fac­tors that pro­vi­de functi­oning ef­fi­ci­ency of le­ading re­se­arch uni­ver­si­ti­es of the USA. The re­se­arch fin­dings de­monstra­te that the di­ver­si­fi­ca­ti­on of fun­ding so­ur­ces, the con­centra­ti­on of ta­lents in pro­fes­so­ri­al, sci­en­ti­fic, stu­dent com­mu­ni­ti­es, the gua­ran­tee of the aca­de­mic mo­bi­lity, and the fa­vo­rab­le ma­na­ge­ment struc­tu­re of the US uni­ver­si­ti­es al­low to lo­wer de­pen­den­ce on eco­no­mic insta­bi­lity, to pro­vi­de de­ve­lop­ment dyna­mism and adeq­ua­tely re­act to pre­sent calls. The cha­rac­te­ris­tic of the system de­ve­lo­ped in the pre­sent pe­ri­od of the US hig­her edu­ca­ti­on is gi­ven; the di­rec­ti­ons of its in­no­va­ti­ve de­ve­lop­ment in mo­dern con­di­ti­ons are de­fi­ned.

Sci­en­ti­fic no­velty. The aut­hor singles out and pro­ves the prob­lems of the US hig­her scho­ol cau­sed by an eco­no­mic cri­sis in the early 21st cen­tury and es­sen­ti­ally af­fec­ted the sta­te stra­tegy in edu­ca­ti­onal ma­na­ge­ment sphe­re and the cor­po­ra­te po­licy of high scho­ols, ta­king in­to con­si­de­ra­ti­on the ines­ca­pab­le fact that fe­atu­res of the US hig­her edu­ca­ti­on system are cau­sed by as­pi­ra­ti­on of this sta­te to hold the le­ading po­si­ti­ons in the world com­mu­nity. The contra­dic­ti­ons of in­no­va­ti­ve de­ve­lop­ment of hig­her edu­ca­ti­on of the USA are re­ve­aled. The aut­hor no­tes that uni­ver­si­ti­es ra­ise a stu­dent fee fo­cu­sing on well-off stu­dents in an ef­fort to sta­bi­li­ze its fi­nan­ci­al po­si­ti­on for­ces as it ne­ga­ti­vely af­fects the for­ma­ti­on of an in­tel­lec­tu­al po­ten­ti­al of the co­untry. On the one hand, ac­ces­si­bi­lity (mas­si­fi­ca­ti­on) of hig­her edu­ca­ti­on due to dis­tant techno­lo­gi­es pro­vi­des in­ter­na­ti­onal po­pu­la­rity to the US uni­ver­si­ti­es; on the ot­her hand, it lo­wers the edu­ca­ti­on qua­lity.

Prac­ti­cal sig­ni­fi­can­ce. Imple­men­ta­ti­on of the re­se­arch out­co­mes whi­le stud­ying the po­si­ti­ve fo­re­ign ex­pe­ri­en­ce and jud­ge­ments of the Ame­ri­can col­le­ag­ues in stra­tegy of ma­na­ge­ment adop­ti­on and the hig­her scho­ol or­ga­ni­sa­ti­on will help the Rus­si­an ones to find own way of ra­ti­onal and ef­fec­ti­ve mo­der­ni­za­ti­on of vo­ca­ti­onal tra­ining.

Download abstract.pdf
Index terms hig­her edu­ca­ti­on in the USA, re­se­arch uni­ver­si­ti­es, in­no­va­ti­ve de­ve­lop­ment, com­pe­ti­ve­ness of hig­her edu­ca­ti­on insti­tu­ti­ons, ac­ces­si­bi­lity of hig­her edu­ca­ti­on, fi­nan­cing, ma­na­ge­ment, dis­tant le­ar­ning.
References

1. Al’tbah F. Bu­duschee vysshe­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ya i aka­de­mic­hes­koy pro­fes­sii: strany BRIK i SShA. [The fu­tu­re of hig­her edu­ca­ti­on and aca­de­mic pro­fes­si­on: the BRICs and the Uni­ted Sta­tes Mos­cow]; Vyssha­ja shko­la je­ko­no­mi­ki [The Eco­nomy Hig­her Scho­ol]. 2013. P. 12. (In Rus­si­an)

2. Bes­pa­lo­va O. I. Prob­lemy raz­vi­ti­ja uni­ver­si­tetsko­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja v Ros­sii i za ru­bez­hom [Prob­lems of uni­ver­sity edu­ca­ti­on de­ve­lop­ment in Rus­sia and ab­ro­ad]. Pro­fes­si­onal’noe ob­ra­zo­va­nie v Ros­sii i za ru­bez­hom. [Pro­fes­si­onal edu­ca­ti­on in Rus­sia and ab­ro­ad]. 2012. Vol. 4 (8). P. 6–9. (In Rus­si­an)

3. Gejdzher R. Pos­ledstvi­ja fi­nan­so­vo­go kri­zi­sa dlja vysshe­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja SShA [Im­pact of the Fi­nan­ci­al Cri­sis on Hig­her Edu­ca­ti­on in the Uni­ted Sta­tes]. Ava­ilab­le from: http://www.ihe.nka­oko.kz/archi­ve/ (In Rus­si­an)

4. Emel’ja­nov S. V. Pri­ori­tety fi­nan­si­ro­va­ni­ja NI­OKR v pe­ri­od ad­mi­nistra­cii Ba­ra­ka Obamy [R&D In­vestment Pri­ori­ti­es du­ring B. Oba­ma’s Ad­mi­nistra­ti­on]. Ros­si­ja i Ame­ri­ka v XXI ve­ke. [Rus­si­an and Ame­ri­ca in the 21st cen­tury], 2012. Vol. 1. Ava­ilab­le from: http://www.ru­sus.ru/?act=re­ad&id=316. (In Rus­si­an)

5. Al’tbah F., Rajsberg L., Jud­ke­vich M., Andrushhak G., I. Pac­he­ko. Kak plat­yat pro­fes­so­ram? Glo­bal’noe srav­ne­nie sis­tem voz­nag­razhde­ni­ya i kontrak­tov. [Pa­ying the pro­fes­so­ri­ate. A glo­bal com­pa­ri­son of com­pen­sa­ti­on and contracts] Mos­cow. Vyssha­ja shko­la je­ko­no­mi­ki [The Eco­nomy Hig­her Scho­ol]. 2012. 439 p. (In Rus­si­an)

6. Kuftyrev I., Rikhtik M. Partnerstvo uni­ver­si­te­tov i biz­ne­sa: opyt SShA. In­for­mat­si­on­no-ana­li­tic­hes­kie ma­te­ri­ally [The partnership of uni­ver­si­ti­es and bu­si­ness: U. S. ex­pe­ri­en­ce. In­for­ma­ti­on analyti­cal re­fe­ren­ces]. Nizhny Nov­go­rod, 2011. (In Rus­si­an)

7. Ki­ric­hen­ko E. V. SShA v po­is­kah ot­ve­tov na vyzovy XXI v. (sot­si­al’no-eko­no­mic­hes­kiy as­pekt) [The USA are in se­arch of answers to the chal­len­ge of the XXI cen­tury (so­cio-eco­no­mi­cal as­pect)]. Мos­cow, 2010. P. 50. (In Rus­si­an)

8. Ukaz Pre­zi­den­ta RF ot 07.05.2012 № 599 «O me­rah po re­ali­za­cii go­su­darstven­noj po­li­ti­ki v ob­las­ti ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ja i nau­ki» [Rus­si­an Pre­si­dent’s Act d.d. 07.05.2012 № 599 «On the me­asu­res of the go­vernmen­tal po­licy in the fi­eld of edu­ca­ti­on and sci­en­ce»]. Ava­ilab­le from: http://graph.do­cu­ment.krem­lin.ru/pa­ge.aspx?1610850 (In Rus­si­an)

9. Altbach P. G., Re­is­berg L., Rumbley L. E. Trends in Glo­bal Hig­her Edu­ca­ti­on: Trac­king an Aca­de­mic Re­vo­lu­ti­on. Rot­ter­dam, Net­her­lands: Sen­se, 2010. (Transla­ted from English)

10. FACT SHE­ET on the Pre­si­dent’s Plan to Ma­ke Col­le­ge Mo­re Af­for­dab­le: A Bet­ter Bar­ga­in for the Middle Class. Ava­ilab­le from: http://www.whi­te­hou­se.gov/the-press-of­fi­ce/2013/08/22/fact-she­et-pre­si­dent-s-plan-ma­ke-col­le­ge-mo­re-af­for­dab­le-bet­ter-bar­ga­in (Transla­ted from English)

11. Can the Cur­rent Mo­del of Hig­her Edu­ca­ti­on Sur­vi­ve MO­OCs and On­li­ne Le­ar­ning? Ava­ilab­le from: http://www.edu­cau­se.edu/ero/ar­tic­le/can-cur­rent-mo­del-hig­her-edu­ca­ti­on-sur­vi­ve-mo­ocs-and-on­li­ne-le­ar­ning (Transla­ted from English)

12. The Most Im­por­tant Edu­ca­ti­on Techno­logy in 200 Ye­ars. Ava­ilab­le from: http://www.techno­logyre­vi­ew.com/news/506351/the-most-im­por­tant-edu­ca­ti­on-techno­logy-in-200-ye­ars/ (Transla­ted from English)

 

You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.