Krasavina Yu.V., Al Akkad M.

Title of the article Aiman Developing Professional Information and Communication Skills through E-Projects
Authors Krasavina Yulia V., Al Akkad M. Aiman
Year 2014 Issue №10 Pages 93
Type of article   Index UDK   Index BBK  

The ob­jec­ti­ve of the study is to show ad­van­ta­ges of the met­hod of e‑pro­jects. Ac­cor­ding to the aut­hors of the pub­li­ca­ti­on, e‑pro­ject ba­sed appro­ach is a pro­mi­sing form of blen­ded le­ar­ning in uni­ver­si­ti­es.

Met­hods. The aut­hors pe­sent the techno­logy of pro­fes­si­onal com­pe­ten­ci­es for­ma­ti­on of fu­tu­re te­ac­hers du­ring the te­ac­hing pro­cess of the dis­cip­li­ne «English lan­gua­ge» on the ba­sis of the analysis and ge­ne­ra­li­sa­ti­on of exis­ting so­ur­ces on blen­ded le­ar­ning and the free Web appli­ca­ti­on Mo­od­le that al­lows or­ga­ni­sing e‑tra­ining. The Ex­pert Gro­up Appra­isal met­hod was used to de­fi­ne le­vels and com­po­nents of the com­pe­ten­ci­es.

Sci­en­ti­fic no­velty. Intro­du­cing e‑pro­ject as a part of stu­dents’ self-study in English for Spe­ci­al Pur­po­ses (ESP) cur­ri­cu­lum is es­pe­ci­ally be­ne­fi­ci­al if the fol­lo­wing ob­jec­ti­ves are sta­ted: strengthe­ning cross-cur­ri­cu­lum know­led­ge that impli­es de­epe­ning and ac­qui­ring new know­led­ge both in English and in dis­cip­li­nes that are im­por­tant for fu­tu­re pro­fes­si­on; and de­ve­lo­ping pro­fes­si­onal in­for­ma­ti­on and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on (ICT) com­pe­tency.

Re­sults. This pa­per pre­sents the ex­pe­ri­en­ce of exe­cu­ting one of the
e-pro­jects in the edu­ca­ti­onal pro­cess prac­ti­ce, al­lo­wing stu­dents not only to ac­qui­re pro­fes­si­onal English com­pe­tency but al­so to le­arn how to cre­ate e‑co­ur­ses in Mo­od­le by the­ir own and strengthen the­ir know­led­ge in mo­dern in­for­ma­ti­on and com­mu­ni­ca­ti­on spa­ce. The ar­tic­le descri­bes the imple­men­ta­ti­on of e‑pro­ject ba­sed appro­ach for te­ac­hing English for fu­tu­re te­ac­hers (bac­he­lor stu­dents) in Ka­lashni­kov Iz­hevsk Techni­cal Uni­ver­sity. This pa­per pre­sents the ex­pe­ri­en­ce of exe­cu­ting one of the e‑pro­jects that was ma­de by one of the stu­dents.

Prac­ti­cal sig­ni­fi­can­ce. The re­se­arch out­co­mes and re­com­men­da­ti­ons can be used for ef­fec­ti­ve imple­men­ta­ti­on of e‑pro­ject ba­sed appro­ach for te­ac­hing English in hig­her vo­ca­ti­onal insti­tu­ti­ons.

Download abstract.pdf
Index terms pro­ject-ba­sed le­ar­ning, e‑pro­ject, ICT-com­pe­tency.

1. Aba­ku­mo­va N. N., Mal­ko­va I. Yu. Kom­pe­tentnostnyi pod­hod v ob­ra­zo­va­nii: or­ga­ni­za­ci­ya i di­ag­nos­ti­ka [Com­pe­tecy-ba­sed appro­ach in edu­ca­ti­on: or­ga­ni­zing and eval­ua­ti­on]. Tomsk: Tomski go­su­darstven­yi uni­ver­si­tet [Tomsk Sta­te Uni­ver­sity]. 2007. 368 p. (In Rus­si­an)

2. Al-Ak­kad M. A. On­li­ne Le­ar­ning Ex­pe­ri­en­ce in Syria. In­tel­lek­tu­al­nie sis­te­mi v pro­iz­vodstve. 2007. № 1. P. 10–21.

3. Al Ak­kad M. A. The Im­pact of Ad­mi­nistra­ti­on on Edu­ca­ti­on Qua­lity. Pro­ce­edings of III In­ter­na­ti­onal Con­fe­ren­ce «Techni­cal Uni­ver­si­ti­es: In­teg­ra­ti­on with Eu­ro­pe­an Edu­ca­ti­onal systems». Iz­hevsk, 2008.

4. Ano­hi­na A. Analysis of the ter­mi­no­logy used in the fi­eld of vir­tu­al le­ar­ning. Edu­ca­ti­onal Techno­logy & So­ci­ety. 2005. № 8 (3). P. 91–102.

5. Groff J. Techno­logy-rich in­no­va­ti­ve le­ar­ning en­vi­ron­ments. OECD – CE­RI Wor­king Pa­per. 2013. 30 p. Ava­ilab­le from:­ri/Techno­logy-Rich%20In­no­va­ti­ve%20Le­ar­ning%20En­vi­ron­ments%20by%20Jen­ni­fer%20Groff.pdf.

6. Fri­esen N. Re­port: De­fi­ning Blen­ded Le­ar­ning. Re­port. 2012. 10 p. Avai­lab­le from: http://le­ar­ningspa­­pers/De­fi­ning_Blen­ded_Le­ar­ning_NF.pdf.

7. Kra­sa­vi­na Yu. V. Instruc­ti­onal de­sign: cre­ating an electro­nic co­ur­se for le­ar­ning English. Techni­cal Uni­ver­si­ti­es: in­teg­ra­ti­on with Eoro­pe­an edu­ca­ti­onal systems: pro­ce­edings of VI EQ in­ter­na­ti­onal con­fe­ren­ce. Iz­hevsk: M. T. Ka­lashni­kov pub­lis­hing hou­se, 2014. P. 184–186.

8. Mo­ore J. L. e-Le­ar­ning, on­li­ne le­ar­ning, and dis­tan­ce le­ar­ning en­vi­ron­ments: Are they the sa­me? / Mo­ore J. L., Dickson-De­ane C., Gal­yen K. In­ter­net. Hig­her Edu­ca­ti­on. 2011. № 14. P. 129–135.

9. Pe­da­go­gi­ka: Uc­heb­noe po­so­bie dlya stu­den­tov pe­da­go­gic­hes­kih za­ve­de­nii [Pe­da­gogy: A co­ur­se bo­ok for tra­inee te­ac­hers] / Slas­te­nin V. А., et al. Мos­cow: Shko­la-Press, 1997. 512 p. (In Rus­si­an)

10. Re­se­arch sum­mary: PBL and 21st cen­tury com­pe­ten­ci­es. 2013. 2 p. [on­li­ne] Ava­ilab­le from:­ject/do­cu­ment/re­se­arch_sum­mary_on_the_be­ne­fits_of_pbl.

11. Sta­ker H., Horn M. B. Clas­sif­ying K 12 blen­ded le­ar­ning. Mo­un­ta­in Vi­ew, CA: Clay­ton Chris­ten­sen Insti­tu­te. 2012. 22 p.

12. Shishli­na N. V., Sa­vi­no­va A. R. Za­dac­hi pre­po­da­va­tel­ya elektron­no­go kur­sa [The tasks of an e-co­ur­se te­ac­her]. Otkrytoe I dis­tan­cioonoe ob­ra­zo­va­nie. [Open dis­tant edu­ca­ti­on]. 2013. № 1. P. 77–82. (In Rus­si­an)

13. Shik­ho­va О. F., Shik­hov Yu. A. For­mi­ro­va­nie kom­pe­ten­cii stu­den­tov – bu­dus­hih pe­da­go­gov na os­no­ve me­to­da pro­ek­tov [De­ve­lo­ping com­pe­ten­ci­es of fu­tu­re te­ac­hers thro­ugh pro­ject-ba­sed le­ar­ning]. In­no­va­ci­onnye pro­ces­si v ob­ra­zo­va­nii: stra­te­gi­ya, te­oria, prak­ti­ka raz­vi­ti­ya. [In­no­va­ti­ve pro­ces­ses in edu­ca­ti­on: stra­tegy, the­ory, de­ve­lop­ment prac­ti­ce]. Ma­te­ri­als of VI all-Rus­si­an sci­en­ti­fic con­fe­ren­ce. Ye­ka­te­rin­burg, 2013. P. 258–260. (In Rus­si­an)

14. Na­ci­onal­naia doktri­na ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ya v Ros­sis­koi Fe­de­ra­cii. [The Na­ti­onal Doctri­ne of Edu­ca­ti­on in Rus­si­an Fe­de­ra­ti­on]. Ros­si­is­kaia ga­ze­ta, 2000. Ava­ilab­le from:­na-dok.html (ac­ces­sed 01.12.2014). (In Rus­si­an)

15. Pro­ekt pro­fes­si­onal­no­go stan­dar­ta pe­da­go­ga. [The draft pro­fes­si­onal stan­dard for te­ac­hers]. Mi­nis­terstvo ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ya i nau­ki Ros­si­is­koi Fe­de­ra­cii [Mi­nistry of Edu­ca­ti­on and Sci­en­ce of the Rus­si­an Fe­de­ra­ti­on]. 2013. Ava­ilab­le from: http://mi­nobrnau­ki.rf/do­ku­menty/3071. (In Rus­si­an)

16. UNES­CO ICT Com­pe­tency Fra­me­work for Te­ac­hers (ICT-CFT), 2011. UNES­CO: web­si­te. Ava­ilab­le at: http://ru.iite.unes­­li­ca­ti­ons/3214694/.

17. Fe­de­ralnyi go­su­darstvennyi ob­ra­zo­va­telnyi stan­dart vysshe­go pro­fes­si­onal­no­go ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ya po nap­rav­le­niu pod­go­tov­ki 051000 «Pro­fes­si­onal­noe obuc­he­nie (po ot­raslyam)» [Fe­de­ral Sta­te Edu­ca­ti­on Stan­dard of Hig­her Pro­fes­si­onal Edu­ca­ti­on for Pro­fes­si­onal Te­ac­hing spe­ci­alty area]. Mi­nis­terstvo ob­ra­zo­va­ni­ya i nau­ki Ros­si­is­koi Fe­de­ra­cii [Mi­nistry of Edu­ca­ti­on and Sci­en­ce of the Rus­si­an Fe­de­ra­ti­on]. 2009. Ava­ilab­le from­ta/d_09/prm781–1.pdf. (In Rus­si­an)


You are reporting a typo in the following text:
Simply click the "Send typo report" button to complete the report. You can also include a comment.