Title of the article | Upbringing as a Means of the Life Creation in its Best Points | ||||
Authors | Luriye Leonid I. | ||||
In the section | PEDAGOGIC OPINION JOURNALISM | ||||
Year | 2014 | Issue | №10 | Pages | 131 |
Type of article | Index UDK | Index BBK | |||
Abstract |
The research is aimed at emphasizing the updating necessity of pastoral work in Russian schools and universities due to changed economic, social and ideological conditions of development of a society. Methods. The research involves the method of socially-pedagogical analysis of current issues in the Russian upbringing and educational system. Results. The author gives own representation of upbringing process, as contextual, complex, system-directed and sociocultural effect on a human being that is conformed to the person, society and state development. It has been affirmed that upbringing process is to outgrow in self-education and strategy development of the realised self-restrictions caused by conventional values and morality norms. The author considers the reasons of the current crisis of educational activity; the solution ways are proposed. Scientific novelty. The research findings give a detailed analysis of modern educational system status that is caused by the “pressure” of modern pedagogics; the author finds out and enumerated the reasons of weak sociocultural of pedagogic society leadership and initiativity. The author proposes the new conception of upbringing activity based on liberally-democratic vision of society structure that provides an opportunity to define the process of world perception formation and active stance towards life of a "cultivated" person. Practical significance. Implementation of the research recommendations can be useful for efficient upbringing activity management that is to unite all the members of educational process. |
||||
Download | abstract.pdf | ||||
Index terms | upbringing, culture, context, self-restraint, innovation activity. | ||||
References |
1. Ahiezer A. S., Shurovskij M. A. Ot dialoga k dialogizacii (v svete koncepcii V. Biblera). [From dialogue to dialogization. Conception of V. Bibler]. Voprosy filosofii. [Philosophy Issues]. 2005. № 3. P. 61. (In Russian) 2. Gorohova A. V. Osnovnye teorii media-industrii i kommunikacij v sovremennom massovom obshhestve. [The basic theories of the media industry and communications in a modern mass society]. Voprosy filosofii. [Philosophy Issues]. 2009. № 12. P. 51. (In Russian) 3. Didro D. Kul’tura chuvstv. [Culture of feelings]. Moscow: Publising House Art, 1968. 185 p. (In Russian) 4. Kiseljov G. S. «Vtoraja Vselennaja»: drama svobody. [«The second Universe»: freedom drama]. Voprosy filosofii. [Philosophy Issues]. 2010. № 3. P. 9. (In Russian) 5. Tolstyh V. Vospitanie chuvstv. [Emotional education] Moscow: Publising House Art, 1968. 16 p. (In Russian) 6. Federal’nyj zakon Rossijskoj Federacii ot 29 dekabrja 2012 g. № 273‑FZ [Federal Law of the Russian Federation d.d. December 29, 2012 № 273‑FZ]. (In Russian) 7. Fedotova V. G. Apatija na Zapade i v Rossii. [Apathy in the West and in Russia]. Voprosy filosofii. [Philosophy Issues]. 2005. № 3. P. 4. (In Russian) 8. Shterenberg M. I. Krizisy i problemy vospitanija. [Crises and education problems]. Voprosy filosofii. [Philosophy Issues]. 2010. № 4. P. 159–162 9. Lane R. E. // The Loss of Happiness in Market Democracies. New Haven, L., 2000. P. 3–4. (Translated from English) |