Title of the article | Propaedeutics of Mathematical Language of Schemes and Structures in School Teaching of the Natural Sciences Profile | ||||

Authors | Kotchnev V. P. | ||||

In the section | CONSULTATIONS | ||||

Year | 2012 | Issue | №3 | Pages | |

Type of article | Index UDK | Index BBK | |||

Abstract |
The paper looks at the teaching process at schools of the natural sciences profile. The subject of the research is devoted to the correlations between the students’ progress and the degree of their involvement in creative activities of problem solving in the natural sciences context. The research is aimed to demonstrate the reinforcement of students’ creative learning by teaching mathematical schemes and structures. The comparative characteristics of the task, problem and model approaches to mathematical problem solving are given; the experimental data on the efficiency of mathematical training based on the above approaches being discussed, as well as the specifics of modeling the tasks for problem solving. The author examines the ways for stimulating the students’ creative activity and motivating the knowledge acquisition, and search for the new mathematical conformities related to the natural science content. The significance of the Olympiad and other non-standard tasks, broadening the students’ horizons and stimulating creative thinking and abilities, is emphasized. The proposed method confirms the appropriateness of introducing the Olympiad and non-standard problem solving into the preparatory training curricula for the Unified State Examinations. |
||||

Download | file.pdf | ||||

Index terms: | propaedeutics, non-standard problem, mathematical structure, task approach, problem-solving approach, model approach, dynamic structure, students’ activity, continuity teaching, natural sciences content. | ||||

References |
1. Boltjanskij V. G., Savin A. P. Talking about mathematics. Book 1. Discrete objects.. M.: FIMA: MCNMO, 2002. 368 s. 2. Verbickij A. A. // Novoe znanie. 2001. № 2. S. 15. 3. Zagvjazinskij V. I. Measurement of problematic in training / / objective characteristics, criteria, evaluation and measurement of pedagogical phenomena and processes / pod red. A. M. Arsentova, M. A. Danilova. M., 1973. 296 s. 4. Zagvjazinskij V. I. The theory of learning. The modern interpretation: studies. allowance. 2 e izd., ispr. M.: Izdat. centr «Akademija», 2004. 192 s. 5. Davydov V. V. The theory of developmental education M.: INTOR, 1996. 544 s. 6. Kolmogorov A. N. // On the mathematics profession. M.: Nauka, 1988. 286 s. 7. Morozova E. A. // On the mathematics profession. M.: Nauka, 1988. 286 s. 8. Pehleckij I. D. The complexity and difficulty of texts and tasks: the book. for teachers and students. Perm': PGPU, 2008. 101 s. 9. Rozov N. H. Differentiated instruction, and the problem of forming "basis" in the space of problems / / Mathematical Education: Tradition and Modernity : tez. dokl. federal'noj nauch.-prakt. konf. N. Novgorod: Izd vo NGPU, 1977. 10. Sarancev G. I. The exercises in teaching mathematics. 2 e izd. M.: Prosvewenie, 2005. 255 s. 11. Theoretical basis of the content of general secondary education / pod red. V. V. Kraevskogo, I. Ja. Lernera. M.: Pedagogika, 1983. 352 s.12. Fridman L. M. Theoretical basis of methods of teaching mathematics. M.: MPSI, Flinta, 1998. 216 s |